Federal Investigation Triggers Controversial Termination of Privacy Expert at Indiana University
Concerns are mounting within the academic community following the termination of Xiaofeng Wang, a prominent researcher in privacy and data security, from Indiana University (IU). Wang, who has significantly contributed to the field, was recently implicated in a federal investigation that led to an FBI search of his residences.
Background on Xiaofeng Wang
Xiaofeng Wang, recognized for his expertise in biometric privacy, has been a faculty member at IU since 2004. He is not only a respected researcher but also the lead principal investigator at the Center for Distributed Confidential Computing, a multidisciplinary center he founded in 2022, backed by a substantial grant of over $3 million from the National Science Foundation.
Details of the Investigation
Wang’s troubles began on March 28, when the FBI conducted searches at two properties associated with him. On the same day, IU provost Rahul Shrivastav sent an email announcing Wang’s termination, which raised eyebrows due to its abrupt nature. It was also revealed that Wang had accepted a new position at a university in Singapore, set to start in June 2025, prior to his dismissal.
Termination Controversy
According to Wang’s attorney, Jason Covert, the couple, including his wife Nianli Ma, have not been arrested, and there are no known pending criminal charges against them. Despite the situation, the university’s actions have been criticized for potentially lacking due process.
Legal experts, including attorney David Tanford, argue that terminating a tenured professor without proper cause or due process contravenes university policy, which necessitates a 10-day notice and the opportunity for a hearing. “The faculty is deeply concerned,” Tanford noted, emphasizing the ambiguity of the situation.
University’s Response
In response to the unfolding investigation, an IU spokesperson stated that the university cannot provide further details concerning the investigation at the request of the FBI. The university’s official stance reflects a commitment to neutrality while complying with the federal directive.
Conclusion
This incident raises not only questions about the wellbeing of academic freedom and tenure rights but also about the broader implications of federal investigations on higher education institutions. The IU community remains on edge, contemplating the balance between legal proceedings and academic integrity.